Noam Chomsky on the Role of the Educational System

Wed, Dec 9, 2009

Videos From Youtube

Noam Chomsky is an Institute Professor and professor emeritus of linguistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The goal of education, Chomsky argues, is to produce free human beings whose values are not accumulation and domination, but rather free association on terms of equality….

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

17 Comments For This Post

  1. Th3Wab3 Says:

    John Taylor gatto goes into depth on similar findings experienced as an educator in NY. He’s is worth a YouTube gander as is Jacque fresco (concerning social design)

    Ty for uploading this

  2. texasB666 Says:

    am i the only Belgian guy, without any degree of whatsoever, who is watching this brilliant man ?

  3. jakechar23 Says:

    exactly, think of it this way. If there was a society made of idiots and someone who is smart comes in that smart person is considered stupid by the rest of society.

  4. KentAllard Says:

    Thats why I’ve always be wary of things like Penguin Classics and similar imprints. Okay its been selected as a literary classic by someone or some group somewhere and it could very well be that they’re right – but how do I know how to judge it?

  5. PurpleWolvyz Says:

    where great attention is given to efficiency and character reports, and attendance at cultural assemblies is mandatory, where it is avowed that all will be administered to each according to his needs and performance required from each according to his abilities, and where those who flee are tracked down, returned, and punished for trying to escape – in short in the milieu of the typical large American secondary school – we attempt to teach ‘the democratic system’?”

  6. PurpleWolvyz Says:

    I cannot post all in 500 words so I’m posting twice, but this is worth reading. As Royce W. Van Norman once said: Is it not ironical that in a planned society of controlled workers given compulsory assignments, where religious expression is suppressed, the press controlled, and all media of communication censored, where a puppet government is encouraged but denied any real authority, ….

  7. dust4ngel Says:

    i have a friend who’s a phd candidate in philosophy – he told me that nowhere in any of the schools that he’s attended has the idea ever been raised that philosophy might actually have practical relevance to the real world. so apparently, that’s how.

  8. 1yellafella Says:

    “People are filtered out for their obedience” those that refuse are called “behavioral problems”

  9. danaseilhan Says:

    The fact that we have both liberals and conservatives discussing this and using the same talking points should be more than adequate evidence to the political middle that something is very, very wrong. As for Plato, Shakespeare, et al, when in the world do public school kids study any of these? Shakespeare maybe… and inadequately. None of the others. By the time they go over them in college it’s too late for most of us.

  10. annakiss Says:

    What year is this from?

  11. gamimenaki Says:

    Thank God for Noam Chomsky! He mentioned the Trilateral Commission. Mention that to any everyday Joe Blow & they’ll think its something to do with your local council! I found out about him 10 years too late!

  12. ariesram74 Says:

    I’d love to see Chomsky arguing with Allan Bloom

  13. flyhayable Says:

    this guy is off the charts WONDERFUL

  14. G33kz0r Says:

    Independent thought* silly typo

  15. G33kz0r Says:

    I think you missed his point. He provided Bloom’s views as evidence for the socially accepted function of education — that is, subservience.

    It doesn’t matter what you study, comprehension requires one to do more than repeat the thoughts of others. Comprehension requires independent though. Our schools propagate the contrary. Their goal as institutions is complete subordination.

    We lose in this manner many eager minds to the educational institution and not to the cause of education.

  16. artiepipe Says:

    He missed Allan Blooms point completely. How do you become an “automaton” by studying Plato, Shakespeare, Rousseau, Nietzche, and Machiavelli?

  17. glenisah Says:

    This is the most honest rational explanation of what it’s about. Public Schools should have a disclaimer stating these very facts. I witnessed kids in my classes that failed varied subjects and still progressed to the next grade, so clearing it has little to do with intelligence!
    Peaxe

Leave a Reply

Security Code: